Results from Baccarat Simulations Series 36 are presented below.
In this series, I examined Setup CS.
| P.A. | Net | Gross | High | Low | Total Bets | |
| Flat Bet: | ||||||
| Z600 | -1.99% | -636.35 | -229 | 34.60 | -639.25 | 32,007 |
| Z1000 | -1.49% | -868.00 | -134 | 74.00 | -876.35 | 58,066 |
| Live 2361 | -1.14% | -1,487.80 | 174 | 100.40 | -1,545.25 | 130,152 |
| Live All | -1.36% | -2,992.15 | -189 | 34.60 | -3,049.60 | 220,225 |
| V10K | -1.22% | -74,457.95 | 2,647 | 25.40 | -74,665.75 | 6,079,675 |
Data Sets: Zummas 600 & 1000, 2361 live baccarat shoes manually recorded from land casino tables, Virtuoid 10,000 shoes (ref. My Baccarat Shoe Factory).
P.A. = Player’s Advantage is the net units won after commissions divided by the total units bet.
Z600, Z1000 = Zumma 600 & 1000 Shoes
Live 2361 = 2361 live baccarat shoes manually recorded from land casino tables
Live All = 3961 Live Shoes (Z600+Z100+Live 2361)
V10K = Virtuoid 10,000 Shoes
Flat Bet = always flat betting 1u
__________________________________________________________
Graphs of Net Units Won (after commissions) per Shoe:
Setup CS:
3961 Live Shoes (Zumma 600 & 1000 plus 2361 Live Shoes):
Virtuoid 10,000 Shoes:
ImSpirit 
3 replies on “Baccarat Simulation Series 36 Results: Setup CS”
Virtuoid, sorry but you lost me here. How are you selecting your bet placements? What is setup CS? I must have missed something.
Just helping out a friend simulate his playing method, with which he has been winning at the tables over several hundred shoes. As it appears, his winning is apparently due to his money management procedures, as my simulation results show his bet placement method yields no inherent advantage flat betting. His gains are thus necessarily short term.
virtuiod.. can you plz email me.